Three ways to develop clinical guidelines. ADAPTE and AGREE GRS procedures

Cover Page
Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract


Development of de novo clinical guidelines (CG) is a complex process that requires highly qualified personnel, an extended amount of time (from 1 to 3 years), and, consequently, substantial funding. In many countries there are limits to these resources, and so, as an alternative to the development of actual de novo CG, the expert community has developed simplified ways of preparing CG: adoption and adaptation. Adoption is the easiest option – it is simply translation of clinical guidelines developed by a credible foreign professional association into the native language. In this case, of course, translated guidelines should be attributed accurately as a translation, without claiming additional authorship by a local professional association. It may be stated that the local professional organization has discussed and approved the translated document. It is also possible to post comments. Another way – adaptation – is to adjust the CG, developed in one country, to the conditions and features of the healthcare system in another country. Adaptation is fundamentally more difficult than adoption. An adaptation procedure has been developed by ADAPTE, an international group of experts. Their detailed procedure, complete with commentaries, is freely available. The key stage of the multi-stage adaptation procedure is the assessment of the methodological quality of the adapted CG using the AGREE II questionnaire or its simplified version, AGREE GRS. An assessment of the relevance, consistency, acceptability and applicability of the CG is also performed. In situations of a pronounced shortage of resources, adoption of the CG is preferable, while under less constrained conditions – adaptation of the CG. Development of de novo CG in the context of an unlimited exchange of information seems inappropriate and unnecessarily costly. The compromise is an adaptation that serves, on the one hand, to significantly save various types of resources, and, on the other, to promote the methodology of evidence-based medicine in the national medical community.


Olga Yu. Rebrova

Endocrinology Research Centre; The Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov; National Research University Higher School of Economics

Author for correspondence.
Email: o.yu.rebrova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6733-0958
SPIN-code: 7360-3254
Scopus Author ID: 6601986825
ResearcherId: A-9071-2010

Russian Federation, 11 Dm. Ulyanova street, 117036 Moscow; 1, Ostrovityanova street, Moscow, 117997; 20, Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, 101000

MD, PhD

  1. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, et al. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318(7182):527–530. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527
  2. Проект Методических рекомендаций по разработке и актуализации клинических рекомендаций (версия 1.1). ФГБУ «ЦЭККМП» Минздрава России; 2017. – 34 с. [Proekt Metodicheskikh rekomendatsii po razrabotke i aktualizatsii klinicheskikh rekomendatsii (versiya 1.1). FGBU «TsEKKMP» Minzdrava Rossii; 2017. 34 p. (In Russ.)]. Доступ по ссылке https://rosmedex.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/MR-po-razrab.-KR_v1.pdf. Ссылка активна на 01.02.2019.
  3. Проект Методических рекомендаций по оценке достоверности доказательств и убедительности рекомендаций (версия 1.1). ФГБУ «ЦЭККМП» Минздрава России; 2017. – 39 с. [Proekt Metodicheskikh rekomendatsii po otsenke dostovernosti dokazatel’stv i ubeditel’nosti rekomendatsii (versiya 1.1). FGBU «TsEKKMP» Minzdrava Rossii; 2017. 39 p. (In Russ.)]. Доступ по ссылке https://rosmedex.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/MR-po-shkalam_v1.pdf. Ссылка активна на 01.02.2019.
  4. Методические рекомендации по организации и проведению контроля объемов, сроков, качества и условий предоставления медицинской помощи, оказанной пациентам с подозрением на онкологическое заболевание и/или с установленным диагнозом онкологического заболевания. Федеральный фонд обязательного медицинского страхования; 2018. – 42 с. [Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po organizatsii i provedeniyu kontrolya ob»emov, srokov, kachestva i uslovii predostavleniya meditsinskoi pomoshchi, okazannoi patsientam s podozreniem na onkologicheskoe zabolevanie i/ili s ustanovlennym diagnozom onkologicheskogo zabolevaniya. Federal’nyi fond obyazatel’nogo meditsinskogo strakhovaniya; 2018. 42 p. (In Russ.)]. Доступ по ссылке http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71983308/. Ссылка активна на 01.02.2019.
  5. g-i-n.net [Internet]. Library & Resources. International Guideline Library [cited 2019 Feb 1]. Available from: https://www.g-i-n.net/library/international-guidelines-library
  6. g-i-n.net [Internet]. The ADAPTE collaboration (2009). The ADAPTE process: Resource Toolkit for Guideline Adaptation. Version 2.0. 95 p. [cited 2019, Feb 1]. Available from: https://www.g-i-n.net/document-store/working-groups-documents/adaptation/adapte-resource-toolkit-guideline-adaptation-2-0.pdf/view
  7. rosmedex.ru [интернет]. Шаблон клинических рекомендаций (версия 1.0). ФГБУ «ЦЭККМП» Минздрава России, 19 с. [Shablon klinicheskikh rekomendatsii (versiya 1.0). FGBU «TsEKKMP» Minzdrava Rossii, 19 p. (In Russ.)]. [доступ от 01.02.2019]. Доступ по ссылке https://rosmedex.ru/kr/recom/
  8. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. CMAJ. 2010;182(18):E839–842. doi: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090449
  9. Опросник по экспертизе и аттестации руководств. The AGREE Collaboration. September 2001. – 26 с. [Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument. The AGREE Collaboration. September 2001. 26 p. (In Russ.)]. Доступ по ссылке https://www.agreetrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/AGREE_Instrument_Russian.pdf. Ссылка активна на 01.02.2019.
  10. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. The global rating scale complements the AGREE II in advancing the quality of practice guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(5):526–534. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.008
  11. Graham ID, Harrison MB, Brouwers M, et al. Facilitating the use of evidence in practice: evaluating and adapting clinical practice guidelines for local use by health care organizations. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002;31(5):599–611. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00086.x

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.

Views

Abstract - 606

PDF (Russian) - 11

Remote (Russian) - 215

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2019 Rebrova O.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies